Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTTY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#7 • #2284 James Slechta - Continued) <br />Van Zomeren reported that given the number of structures currently on the property, <br />there is 1400 s.f available now. Van Zomeren informed Jabbour that all of the property <br />is one tax parcel and cannot become separate lots. <br />Jabbour said the Planning Commission mainly discussed the issue of size and height. He <br />understood a front setback variance might not be a problem. Slechta said the structure <br />would not ^jpcar higher than die readence as it would be built in a lower devation. <br />Staff ccpkuned that height was measured from grade level and not based on topography. <br />What constitutes a hardship was explruned to Slechta. Slechta said he needs the building <br />to store his possessions so he can live on the property and take care of his aging parents. <br />He said the structure would be a benefit and not a burden. Slechta said he could <br />downsize the structure somewhat and would like to negotiate with the Council. Slechta <br />said he had other options available but the Planning Commission was not willing to <br />pursue other options. <br />Jabbour sad the hardship is one not created by the applicant and storage does not <br />constitute a hardship. Slechta said the property is wooded and screened, and he has not <br />recaved any concern from the naghbors. <br />Goetten informed Slechta that the acreage would allow a total of 1600 s.f. of accessoty <br />structure. The proposed structure exceeds what is allowed in the zoning district. While <br />appreciating Ws situation, Goetten said she could not support the variance request. <br />Peterson agreed with Goetten noting the structure was too ambitious. <br />Jabbour told Slechta that approval would set a precedent and open the doors for others <br />to request similar structures. <br />Flint agreed wth Council comments adding that the Council is responsible for protecting <br />all properties in the City by the code. <br />Slechta was asked if he would like the iqrplication tabled or voted on. <br />Slechta said there were inconsistencies with the information noting the property <br />contained 4.8 acres. Jabbour suggested tabling the application to allow for correct <br />information to be provided by an updated survey and ^ow applicant to consider other <br />options. <br />Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2284. Van Zomeren was <br />directed to send a letter to the applicant asking to allow an indefimte time frame for <br />action on the appUcation. Van Zomeren said a new survey would have to be submitted. <br />Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0.