Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />I <br />minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15. 1997 <br />Lindquist was informed by Gaffron that no garage would be allowed in this location if <br />proposed today. Lindquist noted the garage is hazardous but questioned approving h. <br />Schroeder inquired about the proximity to the water. GafiGron said the garage had an issue <br />with wetland separation. The lake is more than 75* away. <br />Stoddard questioned if the garage could be built without the 10' front setback from the <br />building to enable the 26* wetland separation. Gaffron noted the distances and said it <br />could not be done. <br />McMillan asked if the accessory structure was grandfathered in. The garage would be less <br />than 26* from the wetland, subject to the same ordinances and would be non-conforming, <br />Lindquist noted the problem with wetland on one side of the garage and the road on the <br />other. <br />Brooks said his hardship is the house located on an island with no additional room to place <br />the garage. There is a main garage. He mdicated a lakeside structure is important for <br />storage. Lindquist informed him that the buildings as proposed could not be built new <br />today. <br />Floyd said he was conceptually in support of the plan. <br />Schroeder indicated that the only compelling reason for approval is the existence of the <br />fence tod^. He felt the fence should be moved back. Brooks said he would amend the <br />plan to place it 10-12* behind the tree line. Gaffron said that distance would be better as it <br />gives screening and a 10' clear zone for plowing and parking. <br />: i <br />I i <br />1