Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />4. <br />There are no safety concerns with the addition being less than ten feet from the pool. <br />No doors open to the pool which would be a potential problem small children could run <br />out a door and fall into a pool. Another reason for requiring the 10’ separation is to <br />discourage people from trying to dive out into the pool from upper floors. This is not <br />a potential problem wdth this residence. There are also no fire safety issues with this <br />proposal because a swimming pool doesn't catch fire. <br />It appears from the site plan that several trees will need to be removed to construct <br />the addition. <br />5. The permit record shows that the swimming pool was constructed in 1969. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow the addition to be located the same distance <br />from the existing structure. <br />Attachments <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Proposed Floor Plan <br />Topographical Map <br />Acknowledgement Form from Neighbors <br />Survey <br />Permit Record <br />#2297 Daryl Hansen for Mrs. Robert Keith <br />1045 Edgewood Hill Road <br />PC 9/15/97 <br />page—S