Laserfiche WebLink
5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />The proposed footprint of the accessory structure is 4,032 s.f. v/here 1,600 s.f. <br />is the maximum allowable footprint of an accessory structure on a zoning lot of <br />the given size. <br />The total proposed footprint of all accessory structures on the property is 5,410.6 <br />where 3,200 s.f is the maximum allowable total footprint of all accessory <br />structures on a zoning lot o<" the given size. <br />The structure is proposed to be located 23' from the front lot line where 30' is <br />required. <br />The proposed peak height of the structure is 23' where the peak height of the <br />principal structure is 16' and the height of accessory structures is not allowed to <br />exceed that of the principal structure. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 15, <br />1997 and recommended denial of the proposed variances based upon the <br />following findings: <br />1. <br />2. <br />Adequate hardship has not been demonstrated by the applicant for an <br />accessory structure of the proposed size. <br />The proposed structure exceeds the maximum size allowed for an <br />accessory structure. <br />3. The number of structures and their total square footage restricts the <br />allowed size of any additional accessory structures to 1,421,4 s.f <br />4.A structure of the proposed size is not compatible with residential <br />districts in the LR-IC zoning district. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are not <br />peculiar to it and apply generall)' to other propert>’ in this zoning district and <br />that granting the requested vaiiances would merely serve as a convenience to the <br />applicants, is not necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br />not necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and <br />would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />t .-■if’*'