My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:54:55 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:50:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
426
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />t ' <br />I ! <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18.1997 <br />(#12 - #2281 H«mq)in County - Continued) <br />Lindquist questioned the value of the land taken. Theis said the County and City process <br />has been sone throush and there is a cost share between the two entities. He said <br />information has been ^ven and handouts available. People have spoken out on the <br />orocess. Bern noted the Question of the seotic svstem. Toeis said it would be addressed. <br />A member of the audience questioned the importance of the wetlands and whether another <br />olan would have less imnact on the wetlands. <br />GafGron noted the process has been on-going for over two years. He said the Council has <br />reviewed the alisnments and conclusions have been drawn. He indicated the Council <br />apparently does not feel the wetland impacts are uipificant enough for further alignment <br />changes to be made, resulting in the perception that this current issue is after-the-fact as it <br />relates to the process. He noted the alignment has to be decided before the specific <br />wetland impacts can be defined. Gaffron said the wetland acreage impacted needs to be <br />accepted or changed as part of the application process. <br />Lindquist said he is not comfortable in making that decision at this time. He asked if the <br />Commission recommends an additional hearing. Gaf&on suggested a fist of questions be <br />drawn as an option. <br />Schroeder acknowledged that the alignment has been thought through and is set as the <br />best ontion for the roadwAv <br />Hawn questioned if the main concern shown at the meeting was a resuh of the 8* road <br />alignment change. <br />Cornelius responded that he has learned that if roeetmgs are not attended, dedaons are <br />made quickly and voices need to be heard when the occasion arises. He indicated that the <br />Council has heard the concerns as well. He questioned whether there is an effect on the <br />well water. <br />Lindquist asked about the shift dedsion. Theis said the shift was dedded by the Coundl <br />and then made bv the Countv. The shift allowed the County to quantify the wetland <br />impact, which was unable to be done prior to the alignment determination. <br />Brown indicated that when the alignment shift was done, the meetings happened quicisfy <br />and he missed some of them. He feels he was left out of the process. <br />Schroeder said the question is whether the Coundl followed due process, which he fi^ds <br />they did. He noted that the public can contact Council members at any time.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.