Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18. 1997 <br />(#12 - #2281 Hennepin County - Continued) <br />Lindquist informed the public if they were unhappy with the decisions made by the <br />Council, thev should take the issue uo with the Council as the Plannins Commission does <br />not have the authority. Gafi&on acknowledged that the residents always have the <br />ODOortunitv to sneak with the Council. <br />Cornelius said he feels the discussion regarding the wetlands should have taken place <br />oreviou.sIv. <br />Schroeder noted the issues of consequence have been discussed previously and the <br />ouesdons answered in the oast. Theis said he fdt the auestimis ^ve been answered. <br />Cornelius said this was the first time discussing the wedands, however. Theis said h is not <br />the first time the wetland imoacts have been discussed but is the first time as a Quantified <br />aoeage. <br />Schroeder said he felt Katherine Colgrove should be contacted regarding the issue of <br />effects on her septic system and health related issues. He asked Colgrove if she has had <br />the opportunity in the past to discuss these issues. Colgrove stud that this was the first <br />meetins where wetlands were discussed. <br />McMillan said the drainage plans have not been seen by the Planning Coranussion, and the <br />NIJRP nond and curb and cutter have not been di.scussed. <br />• • • <br />Theis said the construction limits have already been set by the Council, just not where the <br />wetland impacts are as far as septic. He indicated the County would have to replace a <br />septic system if the construction limits affected the septic. These issues would be woriced <br />out with the property owner. Theis said Colgrove's property has been addressed as &r as <br />the amount of water flowing into her pond is concerned and should result in no change to <br />her septic system. Schroeder indicated that he still feels the County needs to address the <br />issue of Colgrove's ^stem. <br />Lindquist brought attention to the Staff memo regarding issues noted for consideration <br />and recommendations made. He asked what conditions are appropriate for <br />recommendation #5. Stoddard asked that there would be a 2:1 mitigation rafio that would <br />take place within the Citv of Orono. Lindauist asked if the concerns of the people here <br />need to be addressed further and how this should occur. Berg concurred that the impact ... <br />on the property owners is important. Smith said there should be a forum by which this <br />could occur. Both Berg and Lindquist feh the concerns of the property owners have nqt,^ <br />been adequately addressed.