Laserfiche WebLink
:y- ’ *■ <br />2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to the existing lot size. The Plaiming Commission <br />previously reviewed a sketch plan to combine three lots on this comer to allow two units. <br />3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Residential development on this property would be an improvement over the condition of <br />the vacant lot. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable <br />use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. <br />Economic factors are not a consideration with this application. <br />Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />Solar access is not a consideration. <br />The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where <br />the affected person's land is located. <br />Residential uses are allowed in this zoning district. <br />The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family <br />dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />Not applicable. <br />The special conditions applying to the stmcture of land in question are peculiar <br />to such property or immediately adjoining property. <br />The conditions that apply to this lot are due to the lot size and the relationship of the lot <br />♦o Shoreline Dr. and Dunwoody Avenue. <br />#2276 Brent and Julie Walton <br />2405 Dunwoody Avenue <br />August 18, 1997 <br />page-4 <br />„ ► <a» T....