Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2268 <br />July 14,1997 <br />Page 2 <br />The intent of the back lot ordinance and its more strict standards, is primarily to decrease the impact <br />on the "front lot". When the Planning Commission reviewed the use of back lots in 1994, it <br />concluded that a standard back lot situation would typically place a driveway directly adjacent to the <br />side yard of the front lot, and the front yard of the back lot directly adjacent to the rear yard of the <br />front lot. Planning Commission concluded that such adjacencies are not always compatible, and can <br />be mitigated by requiring greater setbacks. <br />Arguably, that ordinance did not contemplate the somewhat unique back lot situation encountered <br />on Deer Run Trail. In this case, the applicant ’s defined front yard is adjacent to the front lots side <br />yard. However, applicant proposes to orient his house with the functional fron; yard to the north, <br />similar to other homes on the south side of Deer Run Trail. <br />Hardship <br />Factors which might be consider in support of the variance request include the following: <br />1. Applicant proposes to orient his home the same direction as the adjacent homes to the east, <br />hence it would be appropriate to consider the east lot line as a side lot line, <br />2. Due to orientation of the adjacent residence to the east and the orientation of the proposed <br />house, the lot line in question will function as a side lot line for both the front lot and back <br />lot. Therefore, there is a diminished need for the expanded setback as defined in the code, <br />since the expanded setback requirement was intended in part to mitigate adjacency of <br />dissimilar yards. <br />3. The lot meets all other required back lot standards. <br />4. Granting of the variance will avoid the need to excavate into the knoll on the west side of the <br />property. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of a reduction ot the defined front setback from 75’ to 45' as proposed, <br />conditioned on applicant orienting the proposed residence with the front facing northerly and the side <br />facing easterly, to match other homes on the south side of Deer Run Trail. <br />Options for Action <br />1 . Recommend approval per staff recommendation. <br />2. Recommend approval with other conditions. <br />3. Table for further infoimation (specify). <br />4. Recommend denial (state reasons). <br />5. Other. <br />ch