Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING <br />\ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Ron Moorse <br />Title City Administrator <br />JUN 2 3 1997 <br />CfTYOFORONO <br />DATE: June 17,1997 <br />ITEM NO: <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />City Administrator's <br />Report <br />Item Description: <br />Curbside Recycling Contract Extension for 1998 to 2000 <br />The city has contracted with E-Z Recycling for the last 5 years to provide curbside recycling pickup <br />in Orono. The current three-year contract will expire at the end of 1997. Amelia Kroeger, the West <br />Hennepin Recycling Coordinator, and the West Hennepin Recycling Commission are recommending <br />the contract with E-Z Recycling be extended for an additional three years through the yeai- 2000. <br />a <br />Cost <br />The cost per household for the pickup service will remain at $2.04 per household per month. The <br />total contract cost will increase based on the increased number of households. Based on a household <br />count of2,737, Orono's annual billing for 1998 would be $67,001.76. <br />Market Volatility <br />The market generally provides some level of profit to the contractor for the various recyclable <br />materials. For example; in 1995 the market for newsprint was very favorable. At tliat time the <br />contractor initiated a revenue sharing arrangement through which the city would receive a share of <br />increased revenues due to the very favorable market conditions. This revenue shari.''g agreement is <br />now a part of the contract. <br />Recently, there has been a substantial drop in demand for recycled materials, particularly newsprint <br />and plastics. In the current market the contractor is unable to sell the newsprint and, in fact, is <br />currently paying to recycle the newsprint. This is a good example of how market changes can <br />significantly affect the economic viability of the recycling service and place contractors at some level <br />of risk entering into multi-year contracts with fixed prices. In order to reduce this risk the recycling <br />contractors have begun to request some level of cost sharing with cities during times of market <br />dov' itums. <br />The proposed contract includes a provision that if the contractor is paying more than $5.00 per ton <br />to recycle newsprint the city will pay the contractor 50% of the increased market downturn cost. <br />If the contractor is paying more than $40.00 per ton to recycle plastic containers with a neck, the city <br />will pay the contractor 50% of the increased per ton market downturn cost. <br />We are currently in a market downturn condition m relation to both newsprint and plastics.