Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 9,1997 <br />(#8 - #2182 Herbert Terry Olson - Continued) <br />Goctten moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3914. Vote: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />(#9) SAGA HILL SUBDIVISION <br />Barrett voiced concern with approval of a resolution by the City who is not holder of fee <br />title to the property noted. He said fee holder (State of Minnesota) consent was required. <br />He also indicated the City does not have the ri^t to convey property that is not owned <br />by the City. He suggested the County may acquire designation of ownership from the <br />State. <br />Jabbour said the City should facilitate the subdivision and conveyance of Ae property and <br />asked Moorse to bring the resolution back to the Council as soon as possible. Barrett <br />said he would assist in the process. <br />Gafifron indicated the resolution requires revision of the statement regarding City’s release <br />of property for sale to adjacent property owner. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to table the application to the June 23, 1997 Council <br />meeting. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#10) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES <br />GafiBron reported that the City is receiving more and more applications regarding the <br />addition of plumbing to accessory structures. The concern is with the amenities resulting <br />in structures that could become accessory dwellings. <br />Gafiron reviewed the policy issues as noted in the memo: 1) What plumbing fixtures <br />should be allowed in an accessory building without Council review? 2) At what level of <br />plumbing docs an accessory structure have the potential for secondary dwelling use or <br />non-residential use? 3) When is a restrictive covenant an appropriate alternative to a <br />guest house CUP? Docs the Council wish to review/approve all restrictive covenant <br />rituations? Gaffron noted a separate but related issue involves the sewer unit assessment <br />policy relating to accessory buildings with plumbing. <br />Jabbour asked for Staffs view of what is considered an accessory structure and how to <br />avoid such a structure resulting in property becoming a multi-dwelling property. Jabbour <br />said he was concerned with preventing uses that should be allowed. <br />Goetten suggested using lot size as the criteria