Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />I' <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 9,1997 <br />(#7 - #2241 Kyle Hunt and **artners - Continued) <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if he understood the terms of the resolution. Hunt said he <br />did. He said consideration had been given regarding reduction of hardcover to conform <br />to the 25% allowable if the garage stall was approved. Jabbour informed him if non- <br />conforming hardcover was removed, it would not be allowed to be added in the future. <br />Hunt asked if the hardcover was removed in the 0-75' setback, if it could be gained in the <br />75-250' setback. Jabbour said it could as long as the 25% hardcover requirement is met. <br />Goetten informed the applicant to work with staff. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#8) #2182 HERBERT TERRY OLSON, 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3914 <br />Mr. Olson was present. <br />Vm Zomeren reported that the 1.77 acre property is located in the LR-1A Zoning <br />Distnct where two acres are required. The original proposal requesting relocation of the <br />existing garage 6' to the east was amended and existing survey represents the current <br />proposal. Van Zomeren indicated that the property is considered a through lot requiring <br />a CUP and street setback variance from 50’ to 9* for the reconstruction of the existing <br />garage in its current location. 1 he Planning Commission recommended approval with a <br />5:2 vote. <br />Jabbour questioned what the hardships are for the proposal. Van Zomeren indicated the <br />hardships ^ the through lot status and the topography of the property. Van Zomeren <br />noted Exhibit I, the cost estimate to relocate the garage, was recommended by the <br />Planning Commission for Council review. The contractor's cost estimate includes <br />excavation and paving at an additional cost of $7,000. <br />Jabbour asked if the reronstruction of the garage would be on existing foundation. Van <br />Zomeren said it would include a new foundation but located in the same spot. <br />Goetten noted the steep topography. <br />Van Zomeren reported that a neighboring resident said the neighbors preferred the <br />proposed garage location to minimize lake view impact. <br />Olson had no adaitional comments. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if he had any problems resulting from the use of the City <br />property bordering Olson's on the lake. Olson said he had very few problems. <br />There were no public comments.