My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ele\ ation. Additionally, no more living space can be added to the structure without exceeding the <br />eight limit. <br />The building pad for the lot is limited by the lot width south of the pond and the required side yard <br />setbacks which reduces the building pad to approximately 92 feet in width where a lot with 200 feet <br />width and 60 ft. in side yards would have a building pad 140 ft. wide. The property is ftuther limited <br />by the location of a well in the yard. The Building Code requires that no construction be within 3' <br />of the well. The property does not have driveway access off of Femdale Road West. The property <br />is reacheu by driving across the adjacent property to the east. <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The property can continue to be used as a resic’ *nce. <br />2. The plight of the larHowner ’. due to circumstatices unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner <br />The plight of the landowner is created by the relationship of the existing residence <br />to the side lot lines and shoreline, the location of a well on the property, the existing height <br />of the structure and no basement. The architect has concluded that the best plan to <br />accommodate an exercise room is to go under an existing deck. <br />3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance will not alter change the character of the neighborhood. Both residences <br />on either side of the subject property are approximately 12 ’ to 15' from the property line. <br />The proposed exercise room will be under an exist- dr'-tk. <br />4. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an ur:: <br />use for the property exists under the terms of this chapter. <br />Economic considerations are not a factor with this application. <br />ihip if reasonable <br />5. Undue hardship -^Iso includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />Solar access is not an issue. <br />U224I, Kyle Hunt <br />1185 IVest Ferndale Road <br />Variances <br />5/19/9'' <br />page-3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.