My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
05-12-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:45:10 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:40:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 28,1997 <br />(#7 - #2217 - Thimmesh - Continued) <br />Kelley proposed that the addition conform to the rear setback reducing the addition by 3', that no <br />garage door be allowed on the outside of the storage area with access through the existing garage <br />thus eliminating the possibility of a future owner adding a driveway, and that the shed be <br />removed. <br />Goetten asked if there should be flirther language added to the resolution restricting a driveway. <br />Van Zomeren responded that a driveway does not require a City permit and would therefore be <br />difficult to enforce. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant how he felt about not havmg an outside garage door. Mr. Thimmesh <br />did not think it would look very good and he wants to be able to store snowmobiles, tractor, <br />wagon, etc. in the addition and it would be difficult to get them in through an inside access. <br />Mrs. Thimmesh added that they want to be able to store their "stuff' inside so that it is not an <br />eyesore. They do not need a driveway to move things in and out occasionally. Kelley responded <br />that they would plow an area to get the .snowmobiles in and out and it would look like a driveway <br />from the street. <br />Goetten asked if calculations were based on the combination of parcels. Van Zomeren confirmed <br />that they were. <br />Goetten expressed her appreciation that the applicants wish to get things stored inside but she <br />had concerns over what fiiture owners may want to do. <br />Jabbour agreed with Kelley on the setback and shed issues but questioned the elimination of an <br />outside garage door. <br />Kelley asked for clarification from staff about additional hardcover, such as a driveway, needing <br />a variance. Van Zomeren responded that a homeowner could add a driveway without additional <br />review by staff. Gaffron added that by adding a driveway they could be over the hardcover <br />percentage allowed and technically need a variance. Kelley stated they could then be tagged. <br />Gaffron responded that from a practical point, the City has not enforced such situations but when <br />they come in for a building permit, the hardcover can be addressed. <br />Peterson asked if the applicants felt strongly that they need the shed if the addition were <br />approved. Mr. Thimmesh stated they would certainly like it to store pool supplies and deck <br />furniture. Mrs. Thimmesh added that both the neighbors have garages in the same area. She
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.