Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 28,1997 <br />(#6-#2214 - Kozicky - Continued) <br />Kelley asked for clarification of the dimensions of the garage. The applicant responde d it was <br />24' wide and 38' in length, with the original proposal at 24' ,x 44'. Kelley noted this was an <br />oversized garage in depth. Van Zomeren noted there is also a workshop area in the garage. The <br />applicant added there is a mudroom/laundry area and new entry foyer taking up about 15' leaving <br />the actual garage about 24' x 24'. The existing detached garage in the side yard will be removed. <br />Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to adopt Resolution #3887 granting variances to allow a lakeside <br />deck/porch addition and a streetside garage/laundry room addition for the property located at <br />2016 Shady wood Road. Kelley asked that a condition be added to the resolution placing future <br />owners on notice that additional variances may not be approved. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#7) #2217 JOHN THIMMESH, 1945 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION #3888 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Thimmesh were present. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the application stating the application had been reviewed by Planning <br />Commission at two meetings. The applicant has agreed to combine the two parcels. Planning <br />Commission also recommended removal of the shed. Several variances are required including <br />hardcover, structural coverage and a rear yard setback. The applicant is not proposing to add a <br />driveway, however, staff has concerns about a future oxsTier wishing to do so adding more <br />hardcover. Staff is also concerned about incremental additions for hardcover where a deck or <br />patio gets added and then later applies to add a second story over the hardcover. The Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of the variances to add an 18' x 31' storage area to the <br />existing garage, and asked that the storage shed be removed. The applicant would like to see the <br />shed remain for storage of pool supplies. <br />Mr. Thimmesh noted the shed only takes up .36% of the structural coverage. He would like to <br />keep the shed but could relocate it to meet the 10' setbacks. He added that the shed is fairly new; <br />matches the house and there is a 6' fence around the house so it is not visible to the neighbors. <br />Mrs. Thimmesh stated there would be no reason to add a second story over the garage. <br />Kelley asked which way the water flows naturally from the lot. The applicant indicated it would <br />go towards the lake. <br />I1