Laserfiche WebLink
ii2209 4-18-97 Page 3 <br />b. Wetland mitigation subject to MCWD approval and in accordance with the <br />Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and Corps of Engineers Section 404 <br />Clean Water Act requirements. <br />C. Big Woods Alteration Impacts <br />(See also March 26 staff memo) It is clear from the EAW comments received that the <br />commenting parties wish to have the Dig Woods preserved in substantially its current state. <br />Preserving strips of trees between fairways as proposed will yield a result that will no longer <br />be Big Woods. <br />This fragmentation is necessary if the golf course use is to occur. Applicants have indicated <br />it IS not possible to push all the golf course impacts to one side of the site and preserv'e a <br />substantial (say, 20 acre) block of Big Woods. <br />Commenlers have also provided much discussion about the unique, fragile and threatened <br />nature of remaining Big Woods parcels in Hennepin County os well as how this one relates <br />to Wood Rill and Wolsfeld. <br />The fact remains that the City has no regulations which would specifically prohibit <br />destruction of this Big Woods. At best, in staffs opinion, the City has a limited number of <br />potential options for preserving this Dig Woods remnant, some of which may not be <br />practical. Options include: <br />1 . Purchase the property. <br />2. Approve the CUP subject to no tree removal or grading witliir the Big Woods. <br />3. Deny the CUP. <br />Purchase of the property would l>e expensive and presumably cannot occur unicss/until the <br />Golf Club drops its purchase option. Then, there must be a w illing seller, and the City must <br />have the funds. Also, it is problematic that 2/3 of the Dig Woods is in Medina and the <br />Medina City Council has granted conceptual approval to the project. <br />Options 2 or 3 would presumably rely on a finding that the fragmentation and therefore <br />resultant destruction of die Big Woods is not in keeping with the specific Goals and Policies <br />of the Orono Comprehensive Plan relalmg to preservation of woodlands. The City is perhaps <br />in a more defensible position under Option 2, since a ‘golf course' is supported ns a rural area <br />use in the Comp Plan, is an allowed conditional use in the RR-lB/RR-lD-1 zones, and <br />there arc no specifically defined CUP performance standards which are not being met <br />Although there may be a number of private groups searching for aliemalc uses of the Spring <br />Hill properties with the hopes of preserving the Dig Woods, the City is obligated to review <br />and come to a conclusion on the application at hand. And. if the City concludes the golf <br />4-18-97 Page 4 <br />course is not appropriate and this proposed use goes away, it is a fact that any developer <br />could propose a residential subdivision of the Big Woods which under current ordinances <br />the City would have to approve. Absence of the golf course proposal docs not guarantee <br />preservation of the Big Woods. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission should assess all relevant <br />information regarding the Big Woods and conclude whether it is appropriate to take steps to <br />preserve it. <br />D. Alteration of Wildlife Habitat and Movement Corridors <br />The EAW addresses this issue in some detail. There arc few City codes specifically intended <br />to preserve wildlife habitat and corridors. City wetland regulations do intend to preserve <br />wetland habitats. The applicant acknowledges there will be impacts to wildlife, but suggests <br />those impacts will be less impact with the golf course proposal than there would be with a <br />housing development within this 195 acre site. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (none) <br />E. Impacts on Surface Water Runoff Quality/Quantity <br />1 . Dminaye. City Engineer Shawn Gustafson has reviewed the proposed improvements <br />related to stormwater quantity and finds them acceptable from an engineering standpoint, <br />noting that the hydraulics and hydrology arc consistent with the routing colculations and <br />drainage patterns currently being prepared as part of Orono's Storm Water Management Plan, <br />1 lis letter of March 1 4 makes a number of specific comments which are incorporated into the <br />following staff recommendation. <br />b. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />a. Storm sewer lines should be extended to the normal water level of the <br />wetlands or ponds. <br />There may he a need for a drainage culvert along the north side of Co. Rd. 6 <br />to direct drainage past the tunnel entrance. <br />Existing roadway culverts near the site should be field surveyed and if damaged or <br />deteriorated, should be replaced (Staff note: since applicants' plan does not require <br />upsizing of cul ^ erts, their replacement would normally be done at City expense). <br />c. <br />2. Wetlands (Also sec March 13 staff memo). An adjacent Orono property owner, Dick <br />Krueger, has expressed concern that the proposed impoundment of Wetland #17 in Medina <br />will act to reduce the long-term elevation of. i.c. dry up. the immediately downstream <br />wetland on his property (tlie large wetland between Willowbrook Drive and Wyndmere <br />1