My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
04-28-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:38:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the regular orono city council <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 14,1997 <br />{US - #2204 - Fullerton - Continued) <br />without any resolution. Winston noted that there has been no opposition to the propo <br />as such and conditions placed on the application meet with applicant s approval. <br />Winston indicated that the proposal is unique and is incurring an incredibly high Park <br />Dedication fee. He noted the fees collected from adjoimng communities were <br />would be minimal impact on parks from these lots especially m^th their location on the <br />lake He reiterated that the conditions placed on the proposal by the Planning <br />Commissioners were acceptable. The lots meet City standards, and the development <br />agreement and issue of the roadway can be worked out with Staff according to Winston. <br />Jabbour noted the Park Dedication ftind established in the 1 980 ’s is related to the value of <br />the land. He reported the Council's need for due diligence in enforcing the legalities ot <br />the City and questioned whether the issues could be separated. <br />Goetten asked if the applicant wanted to receive approval on the application less the Par <br />Dedication fee. Winston said he would like to receive total approval with the fee being <br />negotiated. Goetten informed him it is the Council's practice not to grant approval when <br />issues are unsettled. <br />Radio said the normal recommendation would be to address all issues and not separate <br />one from the application. Since the application is in preliminary stages. Radio suggested <br />the possibility of escrowing the fee until the amount is settled. Winston said he would be <br />agreeable to that solution. <br />Goetten voiced concern with requests made by other applicants in the future by setting <br />such a precedent. <br />Winston said he feels the fee is not reasonable and has not been told otherwise. <br />Jabbour informed Winston that the Council will be discussing the issue of the Park <br />Dedication Fund in an Executive Session following the regular meeting. He reported that <br />the City is not in the position to negotiate the fee; the fee must be paid in full or the <br />ordinance changed. <br />3 <br />I <br />i <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.