My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
04-14-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 3:26:20 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:20:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />March 13, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />#2212 Rebers - Preliminary Subdivision <br />as buildable lots, because Mr. Rebers at that time wished to delay decisions regarding future <br />access to the commercial property until such time that it was developed. <br />The Sugar Woods plat conformed to the comprehensive plan by creating Outlot D, a short <br />segment of the future east/west frontage road. Outlot D, however, only provides a corridor <br />from the west boundary of Sugar Woods to the northwest comer of Outlot F. The intent was <br />that at some future time when Outlot F is developed, the remaining frontage road segment <br />eastward to Brown Road would be defined and platted. <br />Outlot C of East Willow Woods was subsequently platted, providing a corridor connecting from <br />the west boundary' of Sugar Woods, westward to Willow Drive for future frontage road. <br />Access is the primary issue with conversion of Sugar Woods Outlot E to buildable lot status. <br />The issues related to any forthcoming specific proposal for development of Outlot E would be <br />addressed during a commercial site plan review before the Planning Commission and Council, <br />prior to issuance of building permits. It should be noted that Outlot E meets the minimum lot <br />area and width standards for a building site in the B-1 District, hence the only variances which <br />might be needed for its development would be related to building and site layout issues. <br />Summary' of Access Issues <br />The following issues related to access have been identified: <br />1. Should Outlot E be allowed to develop with its only access directly to Highway <br />12? <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />How do the 1995-1996 safety improvements to Highway 12 impact access to <br />Outlot E? Is a shared access with the adjacent Wear property desirable or <br />appropriate? <br />Given the expected future relocation of Highway 12 in the next 5-10 years, will <br />traffic on the current route be reduced to a level that might eliminate the need <br />for the frontage road? <br />If not, what factors should trigger construction of the frontage road? Should <br />conversion of Outlot E to buildable status be the trigger for construction of the <br />frontage road?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.