Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 7 <br />February 21, 1997 <br />Zoning File #2204 <br />L?st of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Location Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/96 - Sketch Plan Review <br />E - Ceil Strauss, DNR, Letter 12/20/96 <br />F - Weckman Report <br />G - Gustafson Report <br />H - Long Lake Fire Department Report, Jim Cox Asst. Fire Chief, 12/16/96 <br />I - MCWD Permit Application <br />J - Orono Wetlands Map <br />K - Anderson Report - Wetland Delineation <br />L - Staff Sketch - Road Upgrade Options <br />M - Preliminarv Plans <br />General Review Comment <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary subdivision application of the 5 lot plat at their <br />January 21, 1997 meeting. The subdivision involves the creation of 3 new residential lots and the <br />rean angement of lot line boundaries of 2 existing lots of record. All 5 lots shall be served by on-site <br />septics and wells. All lots easily meet the lot standards of the LR-1A zoning district. The existing <br />pri\ate driveway that currently serves 3 residential units will be upgraded to a private road. <br />Refer to Exhibit B, the original plat of the Stielow Addition did not designate an extension outlet <br />to the south for a future connection to the Fullerton property. The current plat road has been <br />designed as a cul-de-sac road at a 1,600’ length. Five lots within the subdivision and Parcel 6 as <br />shown on Exhibit B shall be served by the upgraded roadway. Lot 4 is the only lot within the <br />proposed 5 lot subdivision that could be further subdivided. Lots 1 and 2 have septic limitations and <br />Lot 3 is restricted by a covenant that prohibits all construction within the south lakeshore yard. <br />Refer to Exhibit B, Tract E’s development is restricted by covenant to 3 residential units. The <br />covenant allows access to these p.'opcrties via the Fullerton driveway and future private road. The <br />propo.sed road within the subdivision could serve up to 8 possibly 9 residential units. <br />During both the sketch plan and preliminary subdivision review, the Planning Commission agreed <br />that the existing drive with entrance m'^r.umcnts, stone retaining walls and mature plantings called <br />for special consideration when designing or planning the upgrade of the drive to a private road. <br />Members concurred that safety and the need to facilitate use ofemergency vehicles had to be a prime <br />consideration in planning the upgrade of the roadway.