Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 4, 1996 <br />(#)0 - Review of O'Sullivan Application - Continued)0 <br />Gaflfron reported that O’Sullivan is proposing a bike trail along Olive Avenue abutting the <br />neighboring properties and thence southwesterly along the north property line. Gafiron <br />questions whether the more appropriate trail location would be through Navarre Lane. In <br />looking at the diagram of the neighborhood, Gafiron noted that the neighbors along Olive <br />Avenue would make use of the trail along the northern portion of the property but to gain <br />access to the convenience store, a more natural trail would be along Navarre Lane. He <br />also questioned whether there were park or trail plans in the area. <br />Flint reported that he walked the area and observed how close together the residential and <br />commercial properties were located. Nevertheless, he saw that to access the area on foot <br />currently would be difficult. <br />Gafiron asked if there was any sense of whether Navarre Lane was used as a corridor <br />now. O'Sullivan responded to the question. He said he sees only a couple people walking <br />on a nice day. Since construction has begun, no one has been walking Navarre Lane. He <br />also has not received any complaints during the construction. He does view people <br />walking along Olive Avenue by the wetlands. <br />McDermott asked about the construction of a trail along Olive Avenue. O'Sullivan said he <br />never has shown a trail behind the property except along the existing Olive roadway. He <br />said he would provide a corridor up to Olive similar to an alleyway. <br />O'Sullivan asked the Commission to consider the possibility of the 10-12' vertical drop <br />from where his dumpster is located on his property to Navarre Lane. O'Sullivan said the <br />slope would have to begin back by Olive Avenue in order to get to grade. Gafiron <br />suggested a ramp as a solution. O’Sullivan suggested a pathway between Olive and the <br />water retention pond. He added that if the trail is on the property, it could possibly be <br />contoured along the way in order to cut down on the slope. He also noted that he never <br />agreed to pay for a trail as well as expressed concern over the liability issue. <br />Flint said he was struck by the fact that the development is geared like a stnp commercial <br />center towards people driving rather than for pedestrians from the abutting neighborhood. <br />He saw a trail as a way to facilitate walking in the area and as a way to access the <br />restaurant. <br />Use asked those present to consider the possibility of a raised trail between the parking <br />areas. She said she was concerned with the cramped spacing of Olive Avenue with cars <br />parking along it as well as with CoRd 19. She noted CoRd 15 was also a bad area for <br />walking. Use saw a safe means of getting to the comer of CoRds 15 and 19 without <br />crossing the street as a real asset. She thought those people whose homes back up to <br />Lafayette would use it. Use said she would support providing a trail to gain a straight path <br />to the comer. <br />1