My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-1984 Planning Packeta
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1984
>
07-16-1984 Planning Packeta
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 3:16:57 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 3:14:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lo attain <br />nrl a now <br />ipplicant <br />. i IrJablo, <br />r of the <br />3'Ji tionai <br />vemio the <br />atO'J that <br />variance <br />t for the <br />•'ouire an <br />closer to <br />roperty to <br />11 with the <br />t he would <br />very <br />variance <br />iplore the <br />applicant <br />:plore the <br />it the City <br />> attorney <br />lo Ericson <br />lays (0). <br />that at the <br />:cd him to <br />3on stated <br />icjit door. <br />t any more <br />* A • 'htm <br />TO Planning Commission <br />FROM:Michael P. Gaffron» Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:July 11, 1984 <br />SUBJECT:#827 C.D. Williams, 1932 Fagerness Point Road - Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-IC = 1/2 acre minimum lot size <br />Application - Replace existing structure, add garage <br />LIST OF EXHIBITS <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey of Existing structures and hardcover <br />Revised proposal and plans <br />Hardcover calculations <br />Planning Commission Minutes 5-21-84 <br />This application was brought before the Planning Commission o"14, <br />1984. At that time you advised the applicant to revise his prop <br />shL no net increase in hardcover. Total <br />Appliclnts^originarpr^^ sf or 38 percent. <br />The revised proposal you now have reflects the elimination of <br />sidewalks, the metal shed, and the existing gravel driveway, and <br />locates a house and attached garage mostly within the confines of the <br />existing house and patio area (see Exhibit E). Then«w proposed house <br />is 1,626 sf with a driveway and entry sidewalk totaling 276 <br />total of 1,902 sf or 30 percent hardcover. <br />Applicant notes he could taper the driveway (narrower near the street) <br />to further reduce hardcover, but I question whether this t® ^e <br />or easily enforced. It would likely force a seconu car to have to park <br />in the limited street area rather than in the driveway. <br />additional lakeshore encroachment is contemplated. <br />hSrLoiJer be ad^heTe'dL ^wo options: <br />1. Use a totally porous driveway pavement; or <br />2. Eliminate the main floor bath and bedroom. <br />m <br />fi .f <br />.-4 <br />41; <br />^ i ■ <br />#827 <br />Page <br />July <br />Lot . <br />Lot 1 <br />Lake <br />Fron <br />Left <br />Righ <br />Hard
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.