Laserfiche WebLink
e. The <br />rperson <br />llahan. <br />dminis- <br />strator <br />Zoning <br />;ion and <br />repre- <br />tv;o lot <br />s of the <br />>ject to <br />ncction <br />:ncr for <br />ich into <br />rights. <br />icy, was <br />Ls noted <br />lots in <br />as been <br />iced? <br />garage, <br />ho roa«1 <br />ted that <br />lildablc <br />»< I f I • :COn-lIGGJOil r.I'CTlIIG 01' APHir. JG, Inn/J <br />V. <br />full jomi nnicnoii <br />1G20 cnfiDrirooD i.orD <br />WMilLUCU <br />CO 14 JOhlJ K^tlCCGII <br />3402 LYfexc <br />ViiI>.IAi;CF. <br />o <br />Kelley stated that ho would ho in favor of th';: <br />vacation. <br />Rovegno stated that the survey is not corroct. <br />Sime stated that the applicant should try to attain <br />additional land by vacating Par#: Avenue and a now <br />survey should ba done. Sin.e noted that tl)o cipplicant <br />was placed on notice that the lot way not be bt.i Idable. <br />Sima stated that he would not he in favor of the <br />variance unless the applicant acquirer, additional <br />land. <br />Callahan noted that even if you vacate Park Avenue the <br />lot v;ould still be substandard. Cal?alujn stated that <br />ho \;ould have a hard time appr -ving this variance <br />application because it could set a precedent for the <br />rest of the neighborhood. <br />Schulz stated tliat if the applicant cculd ^i^nui ro an <br />additional 6,000 sf it v;ould bring thr. lot closer to <br />tliG other lots. <br />Adai.is feit that it would be a aood use of the property to <br />put a house in the lot and that it ‘would fit in with the <br />rest of the neighborhood. Adams stated that ho would <br />be in favor of granting the variance. <br />Kelicy agreed v;ith Callahan that the lot is very <br />substandard. <br />Sir.'.e moved, Kelley seconded, to table the variance <br />application to allov/ the applicant time to c):ploro the <br />idea cl: acquiring additional land, for the ap‘plicant <br />to got another survey and for applicant to explore the <br />access issue. Vote: Ayes tO), Kays (0). <br />John Kricson was present. Ericson asked that the City <br />table his variance application to allow his attorney <br />to review the Zoning Administrator’s memo. <br />Rovegno moved, Kelley seconded, to table the Ericson <br />variance application. Vote; Ayes (6), Kays (0). <br />John Ericson v/as present. Ericson stated that at the <br />last Planning Comraission meeting they asked him to <br />explore acquiring additional land. Ericson stated <br />that ho does not intend to buy the lot next door. <br />Ericson stated that ho didn't want to put any more <br />money into the land. <br />* I <br />■ 1 <br />• ) <br />! <br />i <br />• «• <br />i <br />. I <br />*•: <br />V--, <br />V <br />r <br />TO: <br />FRG <br />DAT <br />SUE <br />Zor <br />Api <br />LIS <br />Exl <br />Ex] <br />Ex] <br />Exl <br />Exl <br />Ex <br />Ex! <br />Th <br />19 <br />sh <br />th <br />Ap <br />Th <br />si <br />lo <br />ex <br />is <br />tc <br />tc <br />oz <br />ir <br />A] <br />pi <br />w< <br />£] <br />h< <br />a< <br />hi