Laserfiche WebLink
it PRD <br />ice of the <br />I meeting. <br />:es for at <br />bhe septic <br />for PRD <br />wetlands. <br />)f the dry <br />APPLICATION <br />Firstr the <br />ed in Harch, <br />taxes (back <br />L back taxes <br />rmalize the <br />econd, the <br />troperty of <br />I <br />u1 <br />% <br />I !i <br />1 <br />'f <br />Briefly to review the original lot line rearrangement. Note Exhibit E# Parcels A, B, C and D were illegally divided off a 30 plus acre lot that was combined with the 70 plus acre lot to the north. The lot line <br />rearrangement was to clear the title and tax records for all involved <br />property owners. Each of the Outlets A and B (current plat) are to be <br />combined with homestead lots. The Peters property in the current plat <br />is Lot 1, Block 1. The remaining lots (residential and outlets) make <br />up the actual Winters* holdings.” <br />REVIEW OP THE 9 UNIT PRD SUBDIVISION <br />Septic <br />All nine residence pads have been tested and found to have adequate <br />soils and satisfactory percs to allow either mounds or <br />standard/shallow trench systems for primary and alternate sites. <br />Each system must be at least 10 feet from the pad's lot line. Gaffron <br />has asked that the septic area be defined in each of the pads to secure <br />these sites because the condition of the soils and water table will <br />inhibit the location of new suitable sites. I doubt whether the <br />designation of septic test sites as outlets on each pad will prevent the <br />mishaps that occur in the development of a property. The "cat <br />operator rarely pays attention to outlets shown on a mylar. He will <br />respond to physical/signage directives * The future homeowner can be <br />alerted to the need to protect the septic test sites in the final <br />resolution and in the private covenants that will govern the use of each <br />property. <br />We will discuss building setbacks in a later paragraph. If the <br />pertinent zoning district standard for setbacks is not maintained in a <br />PRD, the new setback is noted in an approving resolution and also <br />repeated again in the private covenants for the property. Lafayette <br />Ridge was an early PRD; all current ones reflect the innovative <br />building envelopes. <br />The need to stake the septic sites will be noted as a condition of <br />approval. <br />Plat Road <br />The road will remain private serving nine residences. Access to each <br />residence pad will be provided off the plat road. The private road <br />will be subject to the performance standards set forth in Section 11.33 <br />of the subdivision regulations. As before# Cook recommends that the <br />curve at 5 + 00 have the radius length increased to 275 feet. The road <br />must be paved—the plans propose merely a gravel road. The standards <br />are as follows: <br />3” bituminous <br />8” base# class 5 gravel <br />ditches 2* below centerline crown <br />Hennepin County has reapproved the access location. Right of way will <br />be dedicated based on the agreed upon 100 * right of way width for County <br />Road 6. <br />.mm <br />The Eng drainage high wai <br />Based o <br />designai <br />the east <br />designai <br />Minnehal <br />The pro j <br />Final gi <br />applicai <br />will pr< <br />waterway <br />and drai <br />Perfonu <br />The appl <br />has a si< <br />restrici <br />setbacks <br />street/i <br />Pad 7 is <br />for anim <br />structui <br />subdivis <br />locatior <br />arrange!! <br />the 150' <br />setback <br />also rel <br />requestc <br />Additioi <br />All impi <br />trails# <br />setback <br />The plai <br />involvir <br />must be <br />Rec <br />To recom <br />Craig Wii <br />all stan> <br />zoning d <br />followin <br />1.