My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
09-21-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:28:11 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:21:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.3189 <br />The storage shed is located on an outlot that wa.s <br />created within the plat of Bayside Beach for the <br />purposes of providing road access and a site for a <br />graywater sewage treatment system to serve the <br />residences at 3424« 3444 and 3464 Eastlake Street. <br />c) Although the resolution approving the subdivison of <br />Bayside Beach and the creation of Outlot B does not <br />specifxcally prohibit structures within said outlot, <br />the municipal code prohibits placement of accessory <br />structures on a property without a principal structure. <br />d) In this specific case, the use of the outlot is <br />sufficiently controlled by the three immediately <br />adjacent property owners who jointly share in ownership <br />of the outlot, such that the concerns of property <br />maintenance and security are sufficiently satisfied to <br />justify granting of a variance to allow an accessory <br />structure on the property. <br />o) The 12‘xl6‘ storage shed as constructed is located 5.9' <br />from the street lot line, but is suitably screened by <br />existing vegetation and a nearby fence such that the <br />shed is not out of character with the neighborhood nor <br />does it constitute a visual encroachment. Further, <br />moving the structure to meet the required 50' setback <br />would place it in an area where sufficient screening <br />does not exist and is not easily developed. Further, <br />while the existing location of the shed is partially <br />within the 10' drainage and utility easement along the <br />street lot line, the temporary nature of the sned <br />structure would allow it to be moved should it at some <br />future date be in the way of any utility work. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by ‘he applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of ^ 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.