Laserfiche WebLink
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />fi'September 18,1998 ' <br />Subject: Plumbing in Accessory Buildings - Revised Language <br />/;i <br />At your August 14 work session, Planning Commission directed staff to make specific language <br />additions and revisions to the proposed code amendment which would regulate plumbing in <br />accessory buildings. The requested changes have been made and are indicated in italics on the <br />attached draft. Exhibit A. <br />Also included is the staff memo and exhibits of July 16. <br />Summary of Code Ameudment <br />The proposed language for Section 10.03 Subd. 9F will generally regulate plumbing in accessory <br />buildings as follows: <br />1. Allows issuance of permits for outside sillcocks and indoor water supply in all <br />accessory buildings. <br />2. Allows issuance of permits for installation of fixtures requiring wastewater <br />plumbing (other than bathtub or shower) subject to: <br />a. Suitable septic system or sewer connection; and <br />b. Owner must execute a covenant whereby owner agrees to: <br />- No home occupation use unless approved or allowed by code. <br />- No dwelling use except/unless via a guest house CUP <br />- No rental/lease as a dwelling umt <br />3. Installation of a shower or bathtub will be allowed only via a "guest house CUP or <br />a "plumbing in accessory buildings CUP". <br />The propc ied language for Section 10.20 Subd. 3Q creates a new condifional VISS in residential <br />zones to be known as "Plumbing in Accessory Buildings" for those situations where a bathtub or <br />shower will be installed, subject to the same conditions noted in 2a and 2b above. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed language, noting that a majority of the outstanding <br />and anticipated requests for accessory building plumbing will likely not require a CUP under the <br />proposed language. <br />If Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment acceptable, a recommendation tothe City <br />Council would be in order.