Laserfiche WebLink
0 • <br />t <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />meeting HELD ON JULY 14,1997 <br />Kelley asked for clarification on the hardcover calculations of an mcre^e fi-ona 9% to <br />the hardcover noted is the house footprint only. Kelley said a driveway and Sarage « <br />inevitable and would need to know the calculations for them and what amount would be <br />added in the 0-75’where h leads to the home. Jabbour noted that the applicauon is <br />entitled to 25% in the 75-250’ setback. KcUgr questioned what percentage would be in <br />the flood plain. Rahn said the garage would not be below the 931.5’ elevauon and no <br />variance would be required for a garage. Van Zoraeren agreed that no variance would be <br />required. <br />KeDey said he has never turned down an application for a two^ ^e noting the <br />necessity for garages in this area but felt the calculations sho^ be mclud^ He <br />questioned a adewalk leading to tlte residence. Peterson questioned the need for the <br />calculation since it is not included in the proposal. <br />Rahn indicated that he is allowed 1500 s.£ of structure outside the 0-75’ end as much as <br />2200 sX with the size of tiie lot. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant how he plans on walldng to the house. The applicant ^ <br />questioned whether a walkway is required. Rahn said he has no int^on of putting m a <br />adewalk. Jabbour indicated that one would eventually be needed. Rahn smd he usm^ <br />grass area now and the decking and entiy are included in the calculations. He currently <br />parks on the clearing on top of the hillside and there is no established dnveway. <br />'Goetten questioned why the rctidence cannot be pulled back. Rahn said <br />would then be located in the flood pl^. He said he has space for 1900 s.f m the 75-25(X <br />• setback. <br />Kelley asked Staff if 25% hardcover allowed for the 75-250’ setb^ includes land in the <br />floodplain. He was informed by GafiBron and Van Zomeren that it tfd. <br />Jabbour noted the structure coiild be a slab on grade without a foundation. Ja^^aaid <br />he would make his approval contingent on no additional variances ^wed m tiic future <br />afut yny further improvements adhering to standards in the zoiuQg code. <br />Gaffron questioned trith hardcover shown in the 0-75’, whethw this amouirt should be <br />subtracted from that allowed dsewhere. He felt it should be. f ^ <br />where tins has been done in the past. GafBron indicated that with2000 s.f total ^jwed, <br />it would leave 1000 s.f. for ai^ future improvements. Jabbour said that was a good iflea. <br />Rahn agreed to comply with this request