Laserfiche WebLink
• • • • <br />MINUTES OF THE BEGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />^IEETD^G HELD ON JULY 14,1997 <br />(#4 - #2245 Donald Currier, Jr. - Continued) <br />Currier informed Flint that the antenna could not be nested or raised m the location <br />required due to the trees. He noted the survqr shows the trees plotted that are affected <br />1^ the antenna and the tree cover then drawn in. <br />, * . . • . . * ? • <br />Jabbour noted that the ability to have a nested antenna is more visibly attractive than an •• <br />that must be fully extended at all times. Currier said trees would still have to be <br />removed to allow for the fiilly extended antennal <br />Jabbour was informed that the nwghbor in whose yard the antenna would fall, if it would <br />topple, gave his approval. <br />Flint questioned why the antenna cannot be moved 15* further along the same line noting <br />the surv^ does not indicate trees in that area. Currier said the tree cover is located there <br />and would result m the loss of a lotus tree. <br />Jabbour was informed that the horizontal width is a 34' maximum with a 20* long boom. . <br />Flint was told that the antenna is directional motorized by a rotor. <br />In answer to the question of how close the neighhoris structures are to the north property <br />line, Moorse said a letter indicates that the area is uqgroomed without any structures. <br />Kdley questioned what would happen if that property owner wanted to build a garage in <br />that location. Currier said the nei^bor told him he could put the antenna on the property <br />line if he wanted to. Goetten reported that if the ndghboring property was sold, the <br />antenna could create problems for the new owner. Kelley suggested a call option be <br />placed on the antenna if that were to occur. Barrett indicated that this would be difdcuh <br />to enforce. <br />Peterson was informed that there were a couple other antennas in the City and no <br />problems have been reported. The onty other retractable antenna that was on a property <br />in the City was remov^ when the resident moved. Jabbour said he feels the retractable <br />. antenna is a great idea. Currier indicated he would like to maintain the trees to lessen the <br />visual irhpact <br />• • . • ^ ^ <br />Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3925 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Vote; Ayes 4, Naj« 1, Flint. <br />(#5) #2248 DAVID AND JODI RAHN, 1385 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3926 <br />David Raim was present <br />' %