Laserfiche WebLink
The garage will provide enclosed vehicle storage and storage for household goods that <br />would otherwise be stored in a basement. <br />Issues <br />1 . The lot does not meet lot width or lot area requirements. <br />2. Previous variances were granted for side yard setback, lakeshore setback, and hardcover in <br />the 0'-75' setback. <br />3. A conditional use permit was previously granted to construct a portion of the house in the <br />floodplain. <br />4. The amount of hardcover allowed in the 75’-250 ’ setback is to be reduced per resolution <br />by the amount of hardcover allowed in the 0'-75'. The amount of hardcover requested for <br />the new sidewalk, garage, and driveway exceeds the City Council's original directive. <br />5. The Zoning Code allows that a detached garage may be located 10 ’ from the property line <br />on a lakeshore lot if the doors face the side yard. The original proposal was for a turnout <br />area with doors facing the side yard. The revised proposal is for a garage to be located closer <br />than 30 ’ to the street with a street facing door. <br />6. The Bui Iding Inspector has indicated that fill was placed in the floodplain during construction <br />between the house and the street to most likely dlow trucks to have access to the building <br />site. The Inspector has indicated that if a sidewalk is built from the garage to the house, it <br />should be built at the original grade which means it may be seasonally flooded. <br />7. Another issue raised by the Building Inspector is the removal of dirt for construction of <br />the garage. The dirt should not be placed in the floodplain. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the revised plan and the issues with the sidewalk and <br />garage and impact on the floodplain. <br />Attachments <br />#2390 David Rahn <br />1385 Rest Point Read <br />July 20.1998 <br />page~5