Laserfiche WebLink
minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 16, 1997 <br />(i^9 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) <br />l» . 3i' «,b,t B, »„ „ l„,.^ „ “ I” ““"“I', <br />McMIm noted the ^mrnly driveway to be about one cat's lengtK Rahn said he would <br />locate the garage and driveway limber uphiU and close to the 35'setb^ <br />^ “•'* “‘® sIn'Wufe would be located <br />^^e tLtXsrct “‘‘® . <br />Simthw^infonned that the appUcant plans on residing in this residence. She asked if he <br />had considered a two-stoiy design rather than expanding out. Rahn said his neighbor <br />with a two-story design. The proposed design is one story with a steep <br />Smith said she had a problem supporting a plan with doubling hardcover in the 0-75' and <br />asked for less impact in tWs setback. Rahn said the current house is 600 s.f and the <br />proposed is at a minimum at 1,300 gross floor area. He noted the residence next door is <br />at a 29% coverage and was built in 1983 which has the same standards as currently exists. <br />He noted a lot line rearrangement in 1961 deemed the property biuldable. <br />There were no public comments at this time. <br />Lindquist noted that buildable properties are allowed 15% structural coverage and the <br />propos^ is at 1328 s.f. Concern was voiced with the structure location in the 0-75' but <br />Lindquist noted there is no other location in which the structure can be located. <br />Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve implication #2248 for a conditional <br />use permit for l^d alteration for setback in the flood plain, hardcover at 19%, lakeshore <br />setback as existing, and side setback if necessary. <br />Schroeder inquired if a side yard setback is required even though no changes are made due <br />to Ae original variance required for the property. If necessary, a side yard setback <br />variance would be included in the above motion. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. . . <br />• • • <br />15 <br />• •