07-20-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

minutes of the orono planning commission MEETING HELD ON JUNE 16,1997 (its - H2247 Wayne Holmes - Continued) Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application *f2247 vnth the tmderstandmg that fte buildmg cannot be closer than 10' to any property line or other structure, at a maximum of825 s.f, with retaining walls to be approved by the City Engineer, and plans . submitted to staff prior to constructioa The applicant asked if a separate permit was required for the retaining walls. Gaffron said it would be part of the buildmg permit approval Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#9) #2248 - DAVID AND JODI RAHN, 1385 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:40-9:02 F.Ma The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present Van Zomeren reported that the application is a proposal for an existing cabm to square off the residence and restore an existing deck and screen ^rch. The .3 acfe property is located in the one acre zornng (fistnct. The structure «locat^ m the 0-75' setback. A hardcover variance is required to increase the hardcover o 19% Lot area and lakeshore setback variances arc required. A conAtional land alteration is required for any alteration or excavation in the flood plain and^S setback from the shoreline. Van Zomeren reviewed the topography of the prop^ noting that the shoreline contour is at the 924.9* elevation. The 93ff wnto^ W lakeshore: the 932' contour traverses the property, so the middle portion of the lot is considered to be in the flood plain. The concern is where the 931.5 elevation is located. The applicant said he has Uved on WUdhurst Trail since 1975. He noted that the five other homes west of this property is evenly setback as proposed for this residence. • • • There were no public comments. Stoddard inquired what the Watershed Distiict’s comments were Rahn said the Watershed did not require any mitigation for the entry, deci;, and screen porch as there are on post footings. Stoddard suggested relocating the 'f • required. Rahn said his histoiy as a contractor and budding official relatM to • restore the cabin with the addition to square h off and has not consider^ hood plain mitigation would be required, and its present locabon is the property. He would like to maintain the character of the property. He noted that morter to move the structure behind the 75' setback would - equireuse ot a holdmg area m that setback Stoddard noted that mitigation can occur elsewhere. o more • . I