My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:20:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 18,1998 <br />GafTron slated Agenda item U6 will be tabled. <br />(#2) #2340 ROBERT WAADE, 3280/3290 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 6:41-7:12 P.M. <br />Applicants were present. <br />GafTron reported the Planning Commission reviewed this application in February and March, and <br />tabled it without discussion in April. This is a 1 1/2 acre parcel, with sewer available. <br />The back lot that abuts the lakeshore meets area and width requirements. The front lot 1/2 acre <br />requirement is met for the duplex. <br />The revisions made since the last review include reduction of the lot coverage from 22% to 15%. <br />A remaining variance issue is that code allows only two units to be served by an outlot driveway, <br />and Outlot B would serve three units under the current proposal. <br />A drainage plan has been provided and the City Engineer has indicated a number of revisions where <br />clarifications are required. <br />A berm is proposed on the west property line approximately 2-3' in height and 15' in width to <br />provide needed screening from the marina. A City sewer line below the area of the berm will not <br />be impacted by the berm. <br />Outlot B requires a driveway setback variance, and a variance because it does not extend to the south <br />line of Lot 1 and therefore creates a flag lot which is not allowed by code. The width of proposed <br />Outlot B also requires a variance, as well as that of Outlot A. <br />The Planning Commission recommendation should include a determination whether the storm water <br />pond can be credited toward the "extra 50%" back lot area requirement. <br />Staff recommends variance approval for the outlot widths, etc., and approval for the berm as well <br />as a conditional use permit for the duplex use. Gaffron noted the site is zoned appropriately for a <br />duplex, and most of the required variances would be required even if Lot 2 is not proposed for a <br />duplex lot. <br />Mr. Waade noted that he purchased this property because it was zoned for multiple dwellings, and <br />he stated that the neighborhood concerns about quality of development should not be an issue, <br />because he intends to build high quality homes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.