My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:20:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I]lA <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 18,1998 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above mentioned date with the following members <br />present: Chair Sandra Smith, Janice Berg, William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, Elizabeth Hawn and <br />Lili McMillan. Representing Staff were Senior Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, <br />Planner/Zoning Administrator Elizabeth Van Zomcren, and Recorder Lauren Nordseth. Chair Smith <br />called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. <br />OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#1) #2363 WILLIAM BOCKMANN, 1130 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCES - <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 6:30-6:40 P.M. <br />Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren reported this application was previously reviewed at the April meeting. At that time <br />the applicant was to have the surveyor locate the well and the setbacks. <br />The proposed dwelling is in the LR-IB district, with variances needed for side yard adjacent to <br />street, and lot area. The area of proposed hardcover is 3.8% over the allowed hardcover. Staff <br />recommends granting the lot area and side yard variance. <br />Smith asked if the located well is the reason for review, and how it compared to the review last <br />month by the Planning Commission. Van Zomeren answered that the house has been reoriented. <br />Smith asked about the change in hardcover to which Van Zomeren answered that last month the plan <br />showed hardcover at 512 square feet over the maximum amount allowed and it is now revised to 403 <br />square feet. Applicant had no comments. <br />Hawm said it was a good design, and Lindquist said he had no problem with the plan. Van Zomeren <br />stated the applicant’s concern is to have accessible space on the main floor and it was not an <br />unreasonable request. Smith asked the applicant if moving the driveway added more hardcover. <br />Applicant answered that it was about the same, because the only increase is set in an extra 12 feet <br />from street. Van Zomeren stated there was 220 square feet proposed for the deck. <br />Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to recommend approval of lot area and side yard variance, <br />average lakeshore setback and approve hardcover on the condition there is no additions to hardcover, <br />with an additional hardship of accommodating an elderly parent residing in home. Vote: .\yes 6, <br />Nays 0. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.