06-15-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Roy E. Ahern May 16, 1983 Page 2 3. 4. a) show that the record lot split/sale would not create another building site; and b) show that the resulting smaller front properties would, indeed, support a well and septic system. Finally, if you wish to challenge the City's position and apply to divide this record lot into 2 building sites, you will have to file a formal variance request to be heard by the Planning Commissior and City Council with supporting data about ownership history and usage; you will need a plan for providing access to the back lots; and you will need surveys and soil testing to demonstrate that both sites can support private wells and septic systems. This option is not the intent of the new ordinance. Hov;ever, you may have valid reasons or hardships enough to justify the variances. The burden will be on you to demonstrate these hardships. The City Council may approve or deny such an application, but you do have the option of making the application. If you choose to do nothing, the record lot designation in the ordinance will stand, but any futu-e building on the lot will not be permitted until the same or similar lot area variances/lot combinations are formally applied for and recorded at that time. I would suggest that you complete the process nov; to avoid this potential cost and delay. RECORD LOT #58 At the December 30, 1982 City Council meeting, you asked about a conditional use permit for year-round use of your cabin on this property. I have enclosed the application form #4-1, which needs to be completed and returned along with the lot combinatiion form #2, if you wish to have such a request considered by the Council. Our major concern with your property is sanitation. Please carefully complete questions 13 and 14. We will have to see a site survey or at least, a scale drawing of your lot showing where the house, well and septic system are located. Vihen you return this information to the City, we will review it and place it on the next Planning Commission agenda for formal review and recommendation to the City Council. I apologize for the delay in getting this information to you. You will note that the ordinance and attached forms include a July 1, 1983, deadline for your response. I would appreciate your response by that date, but because this notice was delayed, we will extend the actual deadline to September 1, 1983. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Alan P. Oison City Planner / Enclosure