My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
06-15-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:20:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:14:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Telephone 473*7357:r-7 <br />CITY of ORONO <br />I’osl Office Box 6G»Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />May 16, 1983 <br />Mr. Roy E Ahern <br />6449 Barrie Road <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 <br />Re: Big Island(Record Lots <br />Dear Mr. Ahern: <br />“7l^ <br />Enclosed are separate information packets on your two Big Island <br />lots and their status under the revised zoning ordinance adopted <br />last December. <br />' • <br />I recommend that you consider completing and returning the variance <br />resolution forms (#2) and the lot combination forms (#3) for both <br />of your properties. Doing this will ensure that you receive the <br />full grandfather benefits of the ordinance designed to protect <br />building rights on those properties with existing cabins. <br />( RECORD LOT #15. .^^ <br />If-you’"still have a problem with the record lot designation for <br />Record Lot #15, then you should not return the variance resolution, <br />but should instead return the blue form (#1) and whatever other <br />factual data you believe will support your challenge. <br />I have talked to your rnau.t:or, Judy Frommes, concerning these <br />properties and the City's position classifying these six lots as <br />one building site. As I have said to her and previously to you, I <br />believe you have the following options available: ... <br />1. <br />2. <br />Accept the City designation and retain all six lots together as <br />one building site. You coUld rebuild the existing cabin (?) or <br />more likely, replace it with a new cabin located either in the <br />front or to the rear. In this case, I suggest you sign and return <br />the variance resolution to guarantee the automatic/no fee variance. <br />You could sell the back lots to another abutting property owner <br />who could then combine them into his property without creating <br />a new building site. In this case, to rebuild the cabin on the <br />front lot, you would have to formally apply for a change in the <br />record lot designation and for a lot area variance, and perhaps for <br />other variances. Such variances would most likely be approved but <br />the burden would be on you to:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.