My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2369 - Fiedler <br />May 14,1998 <br />Page 3 <br />for parking a large vehicle between the garage and the alley. According to the proposed garage floor <br />elevation, the garage floor will be lower than existing grade to better match the alley elevation. <br />Review of Hardships <br />The submitted hardship statement notes the 'physical constraints because of lot size'. <br />Criteria for Determining Undue Hardship <br />The following criteria must be considered in determining whether adequate hardship exists to grant <br />variances: <br />1. <br />2. <br />4. <br />The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The property contains a small existing residence, but that residence cannot be expanded or <br />replaced without major variances due to the small lot size. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />landowner. <br />The number of variances and the magnitude of those variances are related to the size and <br />shape of the proposed house. A smaller but functional house and garage could result in <br />elimination of the lot coverai^e variance, and reduction in the magnitude of the hardcover <br />variances. These variances are related to the size of the house being proposed. However, <br />replacement of the house even at a smaller size would still require lot area, lot width, and <br />.setback variances since the lot is subject to 2 -acre zone standards, a factor which applicant <br />cannot control. <br />3. The variance, if granted, v^lll not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Applicants' lot and the one next door are identical in size and are by far the smallest lots in <br />the neighborhood. Each contains a small house. The character of this neighborhood is, for <br />better or worse, changing from what it was 10 or 20 years ago. Larger homes on combined <br />parcels are likely to be the norm in the future, rather than the 'lake cottage' character that <br />seems to be disappearing in most of our lakeshore neighborhoods. <br />Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of this chapter. <br />Economic factors have not been suggested as a consideration with this application.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.