My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
05-18-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:22:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:12:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, <br />morals, or in any other respect be contraiy' to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />The granting of variances fur the pool and deck in contrary to the zoning code. <br />9.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />Although the storm damaged the shed, deck and pool, the code requires that new structures <br />comply with minimum requirements. The shed would need to be eliminated because of <br />hardcover or relocated because of the setback. The pool could have been reduced to under <br />1,000 sq. ft. and located at least 10’from each lot line. Granting the variances would be a <br />convenience to the landowner. <br />Issues <br />1.The lot does not meet lot area or lot width requirements. The deck and pool do not meet a <br />30' side yard setback. The house encroaches into i required side yard. The shed encroaches <br />into a required side yard. The garage encroaches into a 15' required side yard. The lot <br />exceeds the allowed hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. <br />2.The deck, pool and shed were replaced due to storm damage prior to obtaining any variances. <br />The deck and pool were more tlian 75% destroyed. Because the pool, deck and shed were <br />replaced without variances, the City was deprived of any opportunity to correct the problem. <br />3.The deck and pool encroach into the average lakeshore setback. The retaining wall is <br />partially located on the adjacent properly. <br />4.The design of the driveway and orientation of the garage increases hardcover. The existing <br />structures exceed structural coverage allowance. <br />5.The file indicates that the pool was built in 1972 without permits. A side yard variance was <br />granted for the pool in 1976. The house and pool were constructed before the shoreland <br />ordinance. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />1. City staff cannot recommend approval of these variances. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />To deny after-the-fact variances for side yard setback for the swimming pool and deck. <br />To deny an average lakeshore setback for the swimming pool and deck. <br />To deny the hardcover variance in the 75'-250' setback. <br />U236f '^eter Lanpher <br />1359 Park Drive <br />Date ofP.C. May 18. 1998 <br />page—5 <br />.(
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.