04-20-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

File #2340 March 13, 1998 Page 6 5. 7. Will Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to allow the driveway outlot to ser\e three total dwellings?^^<Io^:^C^i_jy 6. Does Planning Commission have any other corurems regarding access to this property or to adjacent properties? npems re NO- Since the proposal for a duplex on Lot 2 appears to meet all the Conditional Use Permit standards listed in the code, does Planning Commission have any additional concerns or wish to place additional limitations on the use of Lot 2 for a duplex? 7. 8 Does Planning Commission find any Justification to grant special approval for lake access for the proposed duplex units? ^ q Will Planning Commission recommend approval of a CUP for land alterations to create a ^ berm within 5' of the lot line as part of this subdivision proposal? QU- Does Planning Commission concur with staff that crediting unused 75-250' hardcover toward the 250'-500' zone meets the intent of the hardcover ordinance without the need for a , variance? Staff Recommendation 0^^ II. OF Planning Commission should address each of the 9 issues noted above in any recommendation. If the conclusion is that the subdivision should be recommended for approval with certain variances and conditions of approval, staff would recommmend the following additional conditions:: 1. 2. J. 4. City Engineer to review preliminary grading and drainage plan prior to Council review. Applicant shall construct a 24’ paved width road within Outlot A and grant easements to all property owmers who will make use of that road. Applicant shall be responsible for making whatever changes are necessary to the grades adjacent to North Shore Drive to improve sight distance. The duplex lot shall not have riparian access, and the City shall require the filing of covenants in the chain of title of Lot 2, to document that Lot 2 shall have no access to the lake. 5. Subject to the standard park dedication fee.