My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:13:49 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. <br />8. <br />The granting of the application is necessary for the preser\ ation and enjo>Tnent <br />of a substantial property right of the applicant. <br />The consensus of the Planning Commission is that the applicant is entitled to build a <br />functional deck. <br />The granting of such variance will not merely serv e as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The existing use of the deck is limited in its current state. <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The zoning lot does not meet area or width requirements. <br />The current deck is 2.5' wide and underneath the 3.4' overhang on the lake side of the <br />residence. The deck could be expanded to 3.4' wide and which would not increase either <br />structural coverage or hardcover nor would it further encroach on the lakeshore setback or <br />the average lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission has determined a deck of such size <br />is not functional. <br />Funner encroaching on the average lakeshore setback may negatively affect views for <br />the adjacent properties. <br />A variance application was submitted in 1990 for the addition to the south side of the <br />residence. The application was tabled for lack of an accurate survey. The application <br />was not brought before the Planning Commission again and the addition was not built. <br />The applicants hardcover calculations for the revised deck reflect the percentage increase <br />in hardcover in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback. The applicants calculations reflect a <br />less than 1% increase, which is for the entire property. The increase in the O' to 75' lakeshore <br />setback is approximately 1.5% exclusive of the plastic under rock. Based on consensus <br />reached at the February 17 meeting, the Planning Commission appeared to favor a deck <br />increasing hardcover less than 3%, preferably no more than 1%. <br />Much of the rock over plastic near the house to be removed is located under the proposed <br />deck. The hardcover calculations in this report indicate that removal of hardcover under the <br />deck and overhangs will not significantly offset the amount of hardcover added by the deck. <br />^2335 Lawrence Molsather/LinJa Sallee <br />3285 Carman Road <br />Variances <br />March 16. 1998 <br />Page 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.