Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS <br />Lot Area and Yards <br />Lot Area Lot Width Lakeside Yard Side Yard Street Yard <br />LR-IB 1 acre 140'75'10’35' <br />subject <br />property <br />.44 acre 142' at OHWT. <br />118 ’ at 75' Setback <br />58'-existing <br />53'-proposed <br />16.13'42’ <br />The subject property does not meet lot area or width requirements. The lakeshore setback does not <br />meet the minimum requirement. The proposal would encroach an additional 5' into the required <br />setback. Lot area and width variances are not necessary for this application. A lakeshore setback <br />variance is necessary. <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Size Total Structural Coverage Percentage <br />19,290 s.f.Existing: 2,758 s.f (w/o overhangs)14.3% <br />3,137.31 s.f (with overhangs)16.3% <br />Proposed: 2,950.3 s.f (w/o overhangs)15.3% <br />3,329.61 (with overhangs)17.3% <br />Currently, the lot does not meet the structural coverage requirement if all portions of the residence <br />having an overhang extending beyond 1.5' from the structure are counted toward structural co\ erage. <br />City policy states that if overhangs extend beyond 1.5' from the structure, they count as structure. <br />If overhangs are not counted toward structural coverage, the lot currently meets the 15% structural <br />coverage requirement. As proposed, whether overhangs are counted toward structural coverage or <br />not, a structural coverage variance is required. Most overhangs on the residence appear to be <br />approximately 2', while the rear overhang is 3.4'. The amount of proposed structural coverage has <br />been reduced from the previous proposal. <br />M233S La\vrence Molsather/Linda Sallee <br />3285 Carman Road <br />Variances <br />March 16. 1998 <br />Page 2