Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 <br />(#11- #2325 Lake Country Builders for John and Cindy Olson - Continued) <br />Smith indicated that the ordinance came into effect after the residence was built. She <br />would allow replacement of existing structure but could not approve the addition of <br />structure. Smith noted there could be an impact on erosion as well, which would have an <br />accumulative effect. <br />McMillan noted the presence of sliding glass doors. The builder said one door is on the <br />lakeside to the deck. The other door is part of the addition and located off of a bathroom. <br />He would have to make the door stationary if no deck is allowed. It was noted that the <br />8’x8' deck is included in the information but not shown on the survey. This deck would be <br />located in the bluff impact zone. Lindquist informed the builder that he could not approve <br />this deck. The builder said the ordinance allows for no further construction on this home. <br />Lindquist said there are many homes in Orono in a similar situation. The builder asked if a <br />screen porch could be screened in on the existing deck. Lindquist said it was a probability. <br />The builder agreed to table the application in order to redesign the deck. <br />Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2325 subject to redesign of <br />the deck. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(A short break was held.) <br />(#12) #2296 ROBERT BREDESON, 1395 REST POINT ROAD - Variances for lot <br />area, lot width, lakeshore setback, structural coverage, rear yard setback, and <br />hardcover to construct a new residence on a vacant lot and a fence forward of the <br />lakeshore setback - 9:28-9:58 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Dressier reported the proposal is for the construction of a 1,166 s.f residence with an <br />attached 520 s.f garage on a lot of record not meeting current zoning district <br />requirements. An encroaching fence into the 75' lakeshore setback is also proposed. <br />Variances required for the proposal include lot area, lot width, lakeshore setback, rear <br />setback, structural coverage and hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' lakeshore setbacks. <br />Dressier showed the Commissioners what the allowable building pad would be. He <br />referenced a table located on page 4 of the packet showing the lot sizes in the <br />neighborhood, which also do not conform to current zoning. <br />Dressier noted that the property was not assessed for sewer. There is a "Y" service at the <br />sewer main in the street for a possible future sewer stub. He also indicated that the <br />property is at the 932.5' elevation. This low elevation would not allow for a basement. <br />L_