02-17-1998 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 (#11- #2325 Lake Country Builders for John and Cindy Olson - Continued) Van Zomeren reported that the applicants propose to remove the existing deck on the lakeside of the residence and replace it with a deck, stairs, and a 18'x22' screened porch to the north side of the residence A bluff setback variance is required. The existing residence straddles the bluff line at the required setback. \^an Zomeren noted that almost any new construction or remodeling would require a variance from the setback due to bluff and location of CoRd 51 Van Zomeren said the porch will be on pylons requiring minimal grading. Other setbacks are met. Regarding the bluff issue, the topography severly impacts this lot, more so than any other adjacent lots. The residence is also closer to the road than the other neighboring homes. Van Zomeren indicat“:d that the existing deck was in poor condition. She questioned whether the applicant should be allowed to expand or add more structure to a lot that today would not be allowed to be considered buildable. The Shoreland Ordinance came into effect into 1992, and the house was built in 1983. The builder said the porch would be 14'xl8’ with the deck continuing around in front of the porch. He leferenced a letter in the packet from the home owners regarding the hardship and their intentions. Interior remodeling is currently underway. The builder indicated the only other location for the deck would be off the master bedroom. He noted the lot is large but the unbuildability of the property creates the hardship. The builder said the owners are ecologically minded and have no plans for any further additions. During public comments, John Erickson asked if the additions would be in front of the 75' setback from the lake Van Zomeren replied to the negative. Lindquist indicated that the construction is basically on top of the bluff. The builder reported that the elevation only drops 4-1/2' from the front to the back of the home resulting in a flat building pad. The bluff drops off from the deck location. He verified the poor condition of the deck. Lindquist and McMillan said they would both deny any new structure on top of the bluff. The builder asked the intention of the bluff ordinance. Lindquist said the intent is to eliminate any impact on the bluff. The builder noted that post footings would be used resulting in no ecological impact or excavation. He asked for consideration of the hardships with the unique land and house setting. He feels the situation when evaluated on a case by case basis would not set a precedent in allowing the deck and porch. The builder said the adjacent homes are closer to the lake and have screened porches and additions