My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■ <br />i <br />Hardcover <br />Distance <br />from <br />Shoreline <br />Total Area <br />in Setback <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Variance <br />Requested <br />250'-500'14,000 s.f 4,814 s.f <br />(34.4%) with <br />street <br />*3,860 s.f <br />(27.6%) <br />excluding street <br />4,200 s.f <br />(30%) <br />4,814 s.f <br />(34.4%) with <br />street <br />*3,860 s.f <br />(27.6%) <br />excluding street <br />614 s.f <br />(4.4.%) <br />The subject property is located in the 250' to 500' setback from Lake Minnetonka. Approximately <br />954 s.f. of the southwest comer is paved street. The road represents 6.81% hardcover. Hardcover <br />calculations that exclude the paved road reduce the total lot area to 13,146 s.f. or .29 acre. Revised <br />hardcover calculation are 3,860 s.f or 29.58% of the reduced lot area. A hardcover variance is not <br />required for this application. However, the applicant should be advised that future variances that <br />increase hardcover would not be viewed favorably. <br />STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP <br />The applicant should be asked for his testimony regarding this issue. <br />Criteria for Determining L^yidue Hardship <br />1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />The deck is in place and is the same size as the previous deck. This replacement could <br />not be retained without a rear yard variance. <br />2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The definition of the front yard being the shortest dimension and the location of the <br />residence on the lot creates a need for a rear yard variance. <br />f(2336 Bruce SiMlon <br />3380 Frederick Street <br />Fanances <br />2/17/98 <br />Page 3 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.