My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:16:23 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:04:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2319 Lauer Homes, Inc., 1040 Tonkawa Road <br />January 14,1998 <br />Page 4 <br />9. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the zoning code. <br />Hardcover variances are not normally granted for new construction where a <br />substantial residence could be built without the need for a variance. Therefore <br />granting the variance might be considered 25 contraiy' to the intent of the zoning <br />code. <br />10. The granting of such variance will not merely sene as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />Planning Commission must conclude whether there are adequate hardships <br />demonstrated. <br />Discussion <br />Five of the si,\ properties to the immediate north of this proposal have undergone <br />demolition/reconstniction projects over the last decade, resulting in a significant change to the <br />character of the neighborhood via a transition from modest lakeshore homes and cabins to <br />substantial upper bracket homes. To the south, where lots have significantly lesser depth, most <br />homes were constructed or reconstructed prior to the early 1980's, of a size and magnitude <br />which generally didn't put them in hardcover jeopardy. <br />None of the five new homes to the north required a hardcover variance. Those property <br />owners took advantage of various means and site factors to eliminate the need for variance, <br />including limiting the footprint of the house and decks/patios, minimizing the area of driveway, <br />locating the house and driveway partially in the 250-500’ zone, and in the case of the most <br />northerly property, enjoying a large 75-250' area due to the shape of the lakeshore. In most <br />cases, the new house was set back further from the lake than the pre-existing house or cabin, <br />to avoid an average setback variance or minimize hardcover. Those new houses range from <br />as near as 80' to the shoreline, to as far as 210' to the shoreline. <br />Applicant proposes a structure that meets the average lakeshore setback defined by the homes <br />to either side, but note that the residence to the south is only 65' from the lake. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1.Docs sufficient hardship exist for the granting of a hardcover variance, or is the <br />proposal simply of a greater magnitude than is appropriate for this site? <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.