My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:16:23 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:04:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Is the proposed location of the conditional use in accord with the objectives of the Zoning <br />1/ Chapter and the purposes of the district in which it is located and the Comprehensive <br />Municipal Plan? <br />Tlie subject lot meets the minimum lot area requirement for the zoning district. It does not <br />‘ meet the minimum lot width requirement which contributes to the problem of siting a three- <br />car side loading garage with an adequate driveway. <br />The subject lot was granted previous variances for structural coverage, average lakeshore <br />setback and hardcover. The principal structure meets the required 10' side yard setback. <br />The Zoning Code provides for normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or <br />a newly constructed building. Any unusual earth filling, removal or grading shall be referred <br />by the Building Inspector to the Planning Commission. One of the guidelines to determine <br />if a grading plan should be referred to the Planning Commission is whether grading or <br />alterations would propose any changes in elevations within 5 ft. of the adjacent residential <br />lot lines, except for drainage swales and ditches. (Section 10.03, Subd. 21 (3)). <br />The comprehensive plan does not specifically address grading within 5' of a property line for <br />the installation of a driveway and retaining wall. In the Land Use chapter of the plan, <br />statement #15 states; <br />"All physical improvements must conform to cityjtandards. Physical improvements <br />related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or <br />utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform. City- <br />established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall <br />City plans." <br />Grading within 5’ of the property line to allow a driveway and retaining wall may be <br />considered a physical improvement to the subject property. How’ever, staff believes <br />that this plan statement refers to new development. There is no clear policy direction in the <br />plan that relates to rebuilding on a site and locating driveways. <br />In the Environment chapter, statement #13, the plan states that on-site water retention <br />facilities will be required for development projects whenever necessary to maintain or <br />improve the existing storm water runoff patterns. The policy also states that no development <br />will be permitted to adversely impact it's neighbors, or the City, by changing drainage <br />patterns or by otherwise adversely affecting storm water drainage. <br />#2290 Elaine and Steve Silus <br />3235 Casco Circle <br />CUP <br />1/20/98 <br />page-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.