My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2023 2:19:49 PM
Creation date
7/25/2023 2:17:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />July 18, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Please also keep in mind the court largely accepted Long Lake’s arguments for the <br />temporary injunction which, putting it charitably, are inaccurate in many respects. <br />We will have the opportunity to correct the record, if necessary, if this matter does not <br />resolve at mediation. For example, there was nothing illegal concerning Orono’s <br />acquisition of a ladder truck. Orono is entitled to assemble the necessary equipment <br />to outfit its fire department (and will continue to be able to do so). Even after acquiring <br />the ladder truck, Orono offered to allow Long Lake to utilize the ladder truck, if it did <br />not want to acquire its own ladder truck. This demonstrates Orono is not attempting <br />to undermine the Long Lake Fire Department (“LLFD”). To the contrary, Orono is on <br />record that it will ensure the LLFD has the equipment necessary to service the needs <br />of the community. <br /> <br />As to hiring Chief Van Eyll, Orono went through an open and public process, no <br />different than any other community or public employer. It should be no surprise the <br />Chief, who was most familiar with the community, was the top choice. The decision <br />to accept the chief position was his own decision to accept as he can choose where he <br />wants to work, just like any other prospective employee. Similarly, the City may <br />choose to hire any LLFD firefighter who applies for a position, but pursuant to the <br />order may not proactively solicit their employment. Finally, the Minnesota Legislature <br />recently passed a law this past session that bans non-compete agreements between <br />employers and employees, so any argument LLFD firefighters cannot choose where <br />they work would be a violation of existing state law. <br /> <br />As to Long Lake’s complaints concerning capital budgets, Orono is contractually <br />authorized to reject a proposed budget, and Long Lake is as well. More to the point, <br />there is a process in place if either Orono or Long Lake does not approve a proposed <br />capital budget. It would be financially irresponsible for Orono to approve budgets that <br />are not economically realistic. Taxpayers should expect their elected officials will <br />critically review any proposed budget, and the Court cannot usurp that legislative <br />function. The City Council has made clear it is committed to providing the LLFD the <br />equipment it needs and will continue to review capital purchase proposals on a case- <br />by-case basis. <br /> <br />As to the firefighters’ pension programs, there is also no evidence of any wrongdoing <br />on the part of the City. Rather, it is an undisputed fact that representatives from Orono <br />and Long Lake jointly met with legislators in 2023 to see if firefighters from the LLFD <br />could transfer their pension dollars to Orono on an individual basis if they decided to <br />work for the Orono fire department. This was done for the benefit of any firefighters <br />who may choose to make the career switch to keep their years of pension vesting <br />without interruption. In summary, Long Lake’s characterization of this legislative <br />effort is a false narrative. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.