My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
07-24-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2023 2:19:49 PM
Creation date
7/25/2023 2:17:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DATE: July 18, 2023 <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />CC: City Staff / City Attorney / LMCIT <br /> <br />FROM: Paul Donald Reuvers <br /> <br />RE: City of Long Lake v. City of Orono <br />Court File No. 27-CV-23-9758 <br />___________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />My law firm has been retained through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance <br />Trust to represent the City of Orono (“Orono”) in this litigation. This memorandum <br />will update you on the status of this litigation and provide our preliminary analysis <br />of the legal issues and recommendations moving forward. <br /> <br />The City of Long Lake (“Long Lake”) sued Orono, asserting various breach of contract <br />claims. In summary, we do not believe any of the claims have any legal merit, and we <br />view this litigation as more politically motivated. It is our legal opinion there has been <br />no breach of contract and Orono’s decision to establish its own fire department has <br />been open and transparent. <br /> <br />Long Lake sought and the district court granted Long Lake’s Motion for a Temporary <br />Injunction on July 14, 2023, which essentially maintains the status quo of the <br />relationships between Orono and Long Lake during the pendency of this litigation. <br />Importantly, the court made clear its order was not a decision on the merits of the case, <br />and that will be sorted out in the litigation process. Instead, the court directed the <br />parties to engage in mediation to avoid the cost and expense of litigation between two <br />municipalities. We have agreed to utilize the services of retired Minnesota Supreme <br />Court Chief Justice Kathleen Blatz to act as a mediator. We are coordinating with <br />Long Lake’s counsel to set up mediation and hope to do so in the next 30-60 days. <br /> <br />It is also significant the district court did not find Orono violated any of its contractual <br />obligations. Quite frankly, it clearly has not. Orono has repeatedly confirmed it will <br />abide by its contractual obligations, while taking the reasonable steps to construct and <br />establish its own fire department. I want to make clear that despite the litigation and <br />current order from the district court, Orono will be able to continue to hire personnel, <br />acquire equipment, and take the steps necessary to establish its own fire department <br />to serve this community, while vigorously defending this litigation initiated by Long <br />Lake. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.