Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 24 of 28 <br /> <br />Barnhart stated some of the responsibility would be shifted from the survey company to City Staff. <br /> <br />McMillan stated a small fee could perhaps be charged. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated Staff could look at the fee schedule. Barnhart stated in the previous city he worked at, <br />they started with a survey, the property owner can make modifications to the survey for a small project, <br />but that bigger projects required a full survey. Barnhart stated patios, small sheds, and small deck <br />expansions often can be accommodated with an older survey. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted last week he reviewed a project where they were proposing constructing a 240 square foot <br />deck, 75 feet in from all property lines. Barnhart stated if it did not meet the five criteria that were <br />approved in May, they would have been required to go through the survey process. <br /> <br />Printup stated in his view this is a great step forward and that he would continue to encourage Staff to <br />look at lots under two acres to see what other kind of flexibility can be given. <br /> <br />Levang asked if this amendment would apply to anybody regardless of how many acres they have. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated that is correct as long as they meet the other requirements. <br /> <br />McMillan stated this would help people who have constructed a deck and then at some point would like <br />to add a small patio. McMillan asked in the case of a hypothetical 200 square foot deck or patio, whether <br />the person could bring a survey in, draw on it showing where the patio is going to go, and then Staff <br />would say okay, look at the criteria, and perhaps verify and decide whether additional drainage <br />information is required. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated in that situation, assuming that it meets the setback requirements, Staff would look at the <br />survey to see where proposed drainage ways are and the impact the patio or deck would have. Barnhart <br />stated if it is within the setbacks, those issues are lessened somewhat in the sense that there is separation <br />between the properties. Barnhart stated if the setback is 50 feet and they are proposing something at 55 <br />feet, a survey would be required. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated he would like to bring this back to the Council at some point in the future once it is <br />further refined. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how hardcover would be handled. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated the hardcover would need to be verified. <br /> <br />McMillan suggested language to that extent be included. <br /> <br />*15. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT – WOODDALE BUILDERS, 2460 COBBLESTONE <br />COURT <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve the encroachment agreement between the City of <br />Orono and Stonebrook Development, LLC, for 2460 Cobblestone Court. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT