Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />McMillan noted there is a trail on the other side of Old Crystal Bay Road and that perhaps they should <br />consider a little trail to the corner. McMillan stated they probably do not want people crossing over Old <br />Crystal Bay Road. McMillan noted the Planning Commission did discuss a trail around the wetland but <br />that she does not see the need for an internal trail system given the other trail in the area. McMillan <br />suggested a small playground area be considered. <br /> <br />Levang stated the schools also have a number of amenities that the residents could take advantage of. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br />14. #15-3756 CITY OF ORONO, AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 86-68 SURVEY <br />REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Barnhart noted in May of this year the Council amended the requirements of a permit application. These <br />changes included allowances for a site plan to be prepared by a licensed professional to be submitted in <br />the place of a survey for building and grading permits. It also provided allowances for an exemption for <br />projects of smaller magnitude that meet certain defined minimum criteria. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated Staff has prepared an ordinance for discussion purposes that allow the flexibility the <br />Council is looking for. Barnhart stated the proposed language provides flexibility for smaller projects that <br />are well within the required setbacks on any lot that has an as-built survey on file and that it is Staff’s goal <br />to maintain a consistent level of requirements to avoid a number of differing regulations that may be <br />confusing. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff is looking for direction on this item and whether any changes should be made. <br /> <br />McMillan requested Staff talk about what an as-built survey is versus an existing survey. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated an as-built survey verifies what is on the property following completion of a project. A <br />regular survey would be done before the project is started. Barnhart stated Staff feels comfortable that an <br />as-built survey that meets the requirements is a good starting point. <br /> <br />Levang asked if they want to limit how old the as-built survey can be. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that type of language could be added and that he is looking for feedback. Barnhart stated <br />an as-built survey could be from 2006 and there may not be any changes to the property since that time <br />and there may be an as-built from 2013 where a number of changes have taken place. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the survey is 15 years old and nothing has been done to the house, whether that would <br />be too old of a survey. McMillan asked whether the as-built survey would also need to include drainage <br />pathways. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff is looking for an as-built but that it will depend on what the project is for whether <br />drainage needs to be depicted on the as-built. <br /> <br />Loftus asked who would go out to the property to ensure it is accurate. <br />