Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />15-3739 300 Sixth Ave N <br />July 9, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Summary of Review Activity to Date <br />Sketch Plan PC Review, March 16. This property was the subject of a sketch plan review for an <br />11-lot subdivision at the Planning Commission in March 2015. Although this was an informal <br />review, not a public hearing and not subject to public notice, members of the public were present <br />and allowed to speak, and written public comments were received. Applicant subsequently <br />withdrew the sketch plan application and it was not brought forward for Council review. <br />Preliminary Plat, PC Review, May 18. An application for preliminary plat approval was reviewed <br />by the Planning Commission at its May 18 meeting. The proposal (referenced in this memo as <br />Plan A) was for an 11-lot subdivision consisting of seven lakeshore lots (Mooney Lake) and four <br />off-lake lots, all to be served by septic systems and wells. Access to two lots would be <br />individual driveways directly to Hunter Drive; an additional two lots would access via a private <br />road/driveway extending northward from the intersection of CR6 & North Ferndale Road; and <br />the remaining seven lots to be served by a private road following the route of the existing <br />driveway off of County Road 6 and extending northward. At the public hearing there was <br />significant comment from the public with regard to saving the Big Woods area located in the <br />north central portion of the property. Planning Commission ultimately tabled the application, <br />specifically requesting: <br />1. Applicant to introduce more formal covenant or easement language, depictions and <br />specificity regarding the proposed non-buildable areas within individual lots. Additionally, <br />identify with clarity the specific building zones within each of the wooded lots, and better <br />document the limitations placed on future property owners regarding clearcutting. <br />2. Applicant to provide more detail regarding the future intent for preservation of the prairie <br />areas. There was a significant level of frustration expressed by the Planning Commission that <br />the proposed preservation measures described during the sketch plan review have, with the <br />preliminary plat, been diluted to become characterized merely as “the developer has no plans <br />to develop the two large outlots and no interest in developing the two large outlots”. <br />See May 18 PC minutes for additional detail. <br />Preliminary Plat, PC Second Review, June 15. Applicant submitted revised plans and supporting <br />information on June 8, which was included in the June 15 PC packet but had not been reviewed <br />by the City Engineer prior to the June 15 Meeting. At the June 15 meeting Planning <br />Commission reviewed a revised proposal which responded to the previously expressed public <br />concerns by removing one of the proposed lots from the Big Woods area and adding it to the <br />prairie area abutting Hunter Drive. This revised plan is referenced as Plan B in the documents <br />attached to this memo. <br />Planning Commission generally found the revised plan to be a significant improvement over <br />Plan A by reducing the tree removal impact on the Big Woods area. PC recommended that due to <br />the location of the new lot along Hunter Drive within the very visible prairie area, substantial <br />vegetative screening along the south and east borders of that lot should be required to help <br />maintain the open space views of the prairie. <br />