Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER AND GAIL BOLLIS, 200 AND 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD, <br />PRELE IINARY PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6536 (continued) <br />The goal was to understand the situation and whatever rights they have or what rights may have been <br />violated during that process. Miller stated they all made very large investment decisions based on the <br />information that was shared and they wanted to understand the situation. <br />Miller stated he and his wife, as well as Kristine Knorp, were sold lots at the end of a small cul-de-sac, <br />which is what they paid for, what they were sold, and what they want. The property owners at 125 <br />Kintyre, even though they are not parties to the letter, also object to the road extension as well. After <br />reviewing the situation, Miller stated in their view they have some legal basis for their request, which has <br />been outlined in the letter that was submitted to the City. Miller stated since the road itself is owned by <br />the property owners and not the homeowners association, any easement to provide access to the road <br />would require their approval and at this point they are not inclined to provide it. <br />Miller stated the unfortunate thing is that this has an impact on the Bollis' but that they need to defend <br />their rights. Miller stated they would ask the City develop a solution to provide access to the property <br />that does not require an extension of their road. <br />Walsh asked if they have consulted with an engineer regarding the safety of the road. <br />Kristin Knorp, 180 Kintyre Lane, indicated they are still working on that component. <br />Mattick stated as he understands it, the attorney's objection is that members of Kintyre own an interest in <br />Outlot C, which terminates in the cul-de-sac. Mattick stated he does not dispute that since the documents <br />say that, but noted the documents also say that there is a public easement that has been recorded over the <br />outlot. Mattick stated the residents' attorney acknowledges in his letter that there is a public easement <br />over that area for road purposes. Mattick stated as a result of the recorded public easement, no further <br />permission is needed to construct the road since permission was granted before they purchased their <br />properties. <br />Mattick stated the mistake is to the north of the cul-de-sac where another separate outlot was created and <br />for which no easement was recorded. Mattick stated Mr. MacKinnon and his original investment group <br />continues to own that outlot and was not part of the sale. The City has been provided with a public <br />easement over that outlot for roadway purposes. Mattick stated the documents are of record and they <br />state that there is a public easement for road construction without the need for any future permission. <br />Miller stated he would request the City Attorney talk with his attorney on that issue and that his viewpoint <br />is different than that. <br />Mattick indicated he can provide his business card to Mr. Miller. Mattick stated he cannot speak to the <br />representations that were made to the residents at the time of purchase. <br />Mayor McMillan closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. <br />Christopher Bollis, Applicant, stated they felt it would be better to have the construction traffic coming <br />off of the existing driveway at 200 Stubbs Bay rather than having heavy equipment going down the road <br />and they are okay with that. <br />Page 9 of 39 <br />