Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCII. MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER AND GAIL BOLLIS, 200 AND 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD, <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6536 (continued) <br />McMillan asked whether Mr. Bollis has any comments about the septic triggers. <br />Bollis stated they are fine with the triggers and like the suggestion to remove the two-year limit. Bollis <br />stated if Lot 5 is owned by the same person as Lot 4 and they decided to construct a house in the location <br />of the house on Lot 5 and not build a house on Lot 4, the current language would require that septic to <br />disappear when it may never have to disappear. <br />McMillan asked how old the system is. <br />Bollis stated it is his belief the system was updated five years ago. Bollis stated he is fine with the other <br />language to eliminate it. <br />McMillan asked where the language regarding the trail is in the resolution. <br />Gaffron indicated the language regarding the trail is Item No. 16 on Page 4 of 11. The language talks <br />about no land for a public park is required and the Community Management Plan indicates the desire for :-i <br />future trail along Stubbs Bay Road, connecting from a conceptual trail along the south side of the <br />Burlington Northern railroad corridor down to the shore of Stubbs Bay. Whether this trail will ever be <br />completed is unknown but, however, for potential future trail needs a 10 -foot trail easement along the <br />west boundary of Outlot A will be required. <br />Gaffron stated he would strike the last two sentences of that paragraph after public roads. <br />Levang indicated she is fine with that. <br />McMillan asked whether the Council had any other thoughts on the septic issue. <br />Walsh stated he does not have a problem with removing the two-year time frame or the language <br />referencing ownership of both lots by one party. Walsh stated he would still like some type of sanction in <br />the event it does not get done. <br />Gaffron indicated Staff will draft some language that will address that. <br />Walsh stated not issuing a permit is probably the most painful. <br />Walsh stated he would like to make the point that the City is not the litigator if there are issues between <br />property owners. Walsh stated this weekend he attended his daughter's gymnastics party and that he lives <br />at the end of a cul-de-sac. Walsh stated if he had the understanding that that was what he bought, he <br />would not be very happy if it was proposed that the cul-de-sac now become a through road. Walsh stated <br />it puts the Council in an unenviable position of trying to resolve the issue, but it also underscores a future <br />issue for the Council to discuss, which is how important is it to have public roads versus private roads. <br />Walsh stated if they were public roads, it would be documented very well and the City probably would <br />not have these issues. <br />McMillan asked whether the Council should see this application back in two weeks. <br />Page 10 of 39 <br />